[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171019140657.GA22233@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 16:06:57 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@...il.com>, julia.lawall@...6.fr,
rjw@...ysocki.net, lenb@...nel.org,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jic23@...nel.org,
knaack.h@....de, lars@...afoo.de, pmeerw@...erw.net,
dledford@...hat.com, sean.hefty@...el.com,
hal.rosenstock@...il.com, hch@....de, sagi@...mberg.me,
kishon@...com, bhelgaas@...gle.com, nab@...ux-iscsi.org,
balbi@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jlbec@...lplan.org,
ccaulfie@...hat.com, teigland@...hat.com, mfasheh@...sity.com,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
target-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
cluster-devel@...hat.com, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/15] usb: gadget: make config_item_type structures
const
>
> Now we have 9 const instances of the config_item_type structure that are
> identical, with only the .ct_owner field set. Should they be all merged into a
> single structure ?
I think that's a good idea.
But I'm about to slurp up this whole series into my tree, how about making
that an incremental patch?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists