[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1710210321120.9435@t440>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 03:21:22 +0400 (+04)
From: James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, matthew.garrett@...ula.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jforbes@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/27] Enforce module signatures if the kernel is locked
down
On Thu, 19 Oct 2017, David Howells wrote:
> If the kernel is locked down, require that all modules have valid
> signatures that we can verify.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>
--
James Morris
<james.l.morris@...cle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists