| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20171020034117.GB5635@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 11:41:19 +0800
From: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <bhe@...hat.com>,
<keescook@...omium.org>, <indou.takao@...fujitsu.com>,
<caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] kaslr: select the memory region in immovable node to
process
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 11:17:26AM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
>Hi Chao
>
Hi Dou-san,
>At 10/19/2017 06:02 PM, Chao Fan wrote:
>> Since the interrelationship between e820 or efi entries and memory
>> region in immovable_mem is different:
>> One memory region in one node may contain several entries of e820 or
>> efi sometimes, and one entry of e820 or efi may contain the memory in
>> different nodes sometimes. So select the intersection as a region to
>> process_mem_region. It may split one node or one entry to several regions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
>> index 3c1f5204693b..22330cbe8515 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
>> @@ -563,6 +563,7 @@ static void process_mem_region(struct mem_vector *entry,
>> end = min(entry->size + entry->start, mem_limit);
>> if (entry->start >= end)
>> return;
>> +
>> cur_entry.start = entry->start;
>> cur_entry.size = end - entry->start;
>
>Above code has nothing to do with this patch. remove it.
>
>>
>> @@ -621,6 +622,52 @@ static void process_mem_region(struct mem_vector *entry,
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +static bool select_immovable_node(unsigned long long start,
>> + unsigned long long size,
>> + unsigned long long minimum,
>> + unsigned long long image_size)
>> +{
>> + struct mem_vector region;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + if (num_immovable_region == 0) {
>
>Seems it more better:
>
>#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
>for (i = 0; i < num_immovable_region; i++) {
> ...
>}
>#else
>...
>process_mem_region(®ion, minimum, image_size);
>...
>#endif
No, if we set CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG=y(the default is y in fedora), but we do not
use movable_node, we should go to process_mem_region straight, right?
But in your change, we still go to the for(...), even if
num_immovable_region == 0.
So if num_immovable_region is 0, it includes the situation of
CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG=n
>
>> + region.start = start;
>> + region.size = size;
>> + process_mem_region(®ion, minimum, image_size);
>> +
>> + if (slot_area_index == MAX_SLOT_AREA) {
>> + debug_putstr("Aborted memmap scan (slot_areas full)!\n");
>> + return 1;
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_immovable_region; i++) {
>> + unsigned long long end, select_end;
>> + unsigned long long region_start, region_end;
>> +
>> + end = start + size - 1;
>> + region_start = immovable_mem[i].start;
>> + region_end = region_start + immovable_mem[i].size - 1;
>> +
>> + if (end < region_start || start > region_end)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + region.start = start > region_start ?
>> + start : region_start;
>> + select_end = end > region_end ? region_end : end;
>> +
>> + region.size = select_end - region.start + 1;
>> +
>> + process_mem_region(®ion, minimum, image_size);
>> +
>> + if (slot_area_index == MAX_SLOT_AREA) {
>> + debug_putstr("Aborted memmap scan (slot_areas full)!\n");
>> + return 1;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + }
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> #ifdef CONFIG_EFI
>> /*
>> * Returns true if mirror region found (and must have been processed
>> @@ -631,7 +678,6 @@ process_efi_entries(unsigned long minimum, unsigned long image_size)
>> {
>> struct efi_info *e = &boot_params->efi_info;
>> bool efi_mirror_found = false;
>> - struct mem_vector region;
>> efi_memory_desc_t *md;
>> unsigned long pmap;
>> char *signature;
>> @@ -664,6 +710,8 @@ process_efi_entries(unsigned long minimum, unsigned long image_size)
>> }
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < nr_desc; i++) {
>> + unsigned long long start, size;
>> +
>> md = efi_early_memdesc_ptr(pmap, e->efi_memdesc_size, i);
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -684,13 +732,11 @@ process_efi_entries(unsigned long minimum, unsigned long image_size)
>> !(md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_MORE_RELIABLE))
>> continue;
>>
>> - region.start = md->phys_addr;
>> - region.size = md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT;
>> - process_mem_region(®ion, minimum, image_size);
>> - if (slot_area_index == MAX_SLOT_AREA) {
>> - debug_putstr("Aborted EFI scan (slot_areas full)!\n");
>> + start = md->phys_addr;
>> + size = md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT;
>> +
>> + if (select_immovable_node(start, size, minimum, image_size))
>
>Why you replace the region with two parameters? Just use region.
>
You can see the commit message, we may splite one entry to more regions,
so there will be region.start compared with memory region in
immovable_mem and then fill more new regions if we use region here.
The code will look strange.
Start and size will be more clear.
Thanks,
Chao Fan
>> break;
>> - }
>> }
>> return true;
>> }
>> @@ -706,22 +752,20 @@ static void process_e820_entries(unsigned long minimum,
>> unsigned long image_size)
>> {
>> int i;
>> - struct mem_vector region;
>> struct boot_e820_entry *entry;
>>
>> /* Verify potential e820 positions, appending to slots list. */
>> for (i = 0; i < boot_params->e820_entries; i++) {
>> + unsigned long long start, size;
>> entry = &boot_params->e820_table[i];
>> /* Skip non-RAM entries. */
>> if (entry->type != E820_TYPE_RAM)
>> continue;
>> - region.start = entry->addr;
>> - region.size = entry->size;
>> - process_mem_region(®ion, minimum, image_size);
>> - if (slot_area_index == MAX_SLOT_AREA) {
>> - debug_putstr("Aborted e820 scan (slot_areas full)!\n");
>> + start = entry->addr;
>> + size = entry->size;
>> +
>> + if (select_immovable_node(start, size, minimum, image_size))
>ditto
>
>Thanks,
> dou.
>> break;
>> - }
>> }
>> }
>>
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists