linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/46] 4.4.94-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171020062641.GB18761@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 20 Oct 2017 08:26:41 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Tom Gall <tom.gall@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
        shuahkh@....samsung.com, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/46] 4.4.94-stable review

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 05:18:38PM -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
> 
> > On Oct 19, 2017, at 8:48 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > 
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.94 release.
> > There are 46 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sat Oct 21 13:48:23 UTC 2017.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.94-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> Results from the Linaro test farm. This report is in two parts. The second part and reported 
> separately is the HiKey results since there are platform support patches added to the LTS
> to make it work.
> 
> Summary
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> kernel: 4.4.94-rc1
> git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> git branch: linux-4.4.y
> git commit: cc1d76b2d639a37b3e6aec284b6838637d826f08
> git describe: v4.4.93-47-gcc1d76b2d639
> Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.4-oe/build/v4.4.93-47-gcc1d76b2d639
> 
> Regressions (compared to build v4.4.92-29-g51c43ad676c4)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> x15 - arm:
>  kselftest:
>    * raw_skew
> 
>    * test src: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/linux-4.13.tar.xz
> 
>  ltp-syscalls-tests:
>    * fcntl36
> 
>    * test src: git://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp.git
> 
> fcntl36 and raw_skew we’ll looking into.
> 
>  ltp-timers-tests:
>    * leapsec_timer
>    * runltp_timers
> 
>    * test src: git://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp.git
> 
> This one has been working and just failed with this RC cycle. It’s only failing on 32 bit arm.
> 
> Needs to be looked into.

When you say "Needs to be looked into", does that mean that you are
pointing this out for someone else to do this (i.e. help, someone look
at this!), or are you going to be working to figure it out?

thanks,

greg k-h