linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 1/3] iommu/vt-d: Missing checks for pasid tables if allocation fails

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 20 Oct 2017 06:32:26 +0000
From:   "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
To:     Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
        "joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
        "dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>
CC:     "iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3] iommu/vt-d: Missing checks for pasid tables if
 allocation fails



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lu Baolu [mailto:baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 8:49 AM
> To: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>; joro@...tes.org; dwmw2@...radead.org
> Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iommu/vt-d: Missing checks for pasid tables if allocation
> fails
> 
> Hi Yi,
> 
> On 10/19/2017 02:40 PM, Liu, Yi L wrote:
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: iommu-bounces@...ts.linux-foundation.org [mailto:iommu-
> >> bounces@...ts.linux-foundation.org] On Behalf Of Lu Baolu
> >> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 8:39 AM
> >> To: joro@...tes.org; dwmw2@...radead.org
> >> Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> >> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] iommu/vt-d: Missing checks for pasid tables if
> >> allocation fails
> >>
> >> intel_svm_alloc_pasid_tables() might return an error but never be
> >> checked by the callers. Later when intel_svm_bind_mm() is called,
> >> there are no checks for valid pasid tables before enabling them.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c | 2 +-
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c
> >> index f6697e5..43280ca 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c
> >> @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ int intel_svm_bind_mm(struct device *dev, int
> >> *pasid, int flags, struct svm_dev_
> >>  	int pasid_max;
> >>  	int ret;
> >>
> >> -	if (WARN_ON(!iommu))
> >> +	if (WARN_ON(!iommu || !iommu->pasid_table))
> > [Liu, Yi L] Hi Baolu, I guess there also need a check to iommu->ecap ,
> > see if the pasid bit is reported. thoughts?
> >
> 
> If pasid bit is not set in ecap register, iommu->pasid_table won't be set.
> 
> We did this by:
> 
>                 if (pasid_enabled(iommu))
>                         intel_svm_alloc_pasid_tables(iommu);

[Liu, Yi L] Sounds good. thx.

Reviewed-by: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>

Regards,
Yi L