[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d82e759c-21a8-231e-16ff-aa3ab3b719a0@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 08:35:29 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
Cc: rui.zhang@...el.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, leo.yan@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/18] thermal/drivers/hisi: Fix missing interrupt
enablement
On 20/10/2017 03:52, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 07:05:43PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> The interrupt for the temperature threshold is not enabled at the end of the
>> probe function, enable it after the setup is complete.
>>
>> On the other side, the irq_enabled is not correctly set as we are checking if
>> the interrupt is masked where 'yes' means irq_enabled=false.
>>
>> irq_get_irqchip_state(data->irq, IRQCHIP_STATE_MASKED,
>> &data->irq_enabled);
>>
>> As we are always enabling the interrupt, it is pointless to check if
>> the interrupt is masked or not, just set irq_enabled to 'true'.
>
>
> Why only 18 patches this time? Can you please add a cover letter (0/X)
> next time?
Yes sure.
Actually, I grouped the different series (acked and reviewed) into a git
pull request instead of having them around. I thought that could help
you. I sent a pull request with all these patches under this pull
request along with a description. Did you receive it? Note without the
threaded email view, it is easy to miss it.
> What happened to the other 7 patches?
As stated in the PR, I put them apart to solve the multi threshold issue
before resubmitting, probably by folding Kevin's latest change. I will
resend them very shortly.
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists