linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Documentation: Add a file explaining the requested Linux kernel license enforcement policy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171020072928.GB6464@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 20 Oct 2017 09:29:28 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Pavel Nikulin <nikulinpi@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Documentation: Add a file explaining the requested
 Linux kernel license enforcement policy

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 06:28:12PM +0300, Pavel Nikulin wrote:
> Hold!
> 
> Greg, are you trying to put a new addendum to the terms of GPL v2?

Nope, as I said many times, that's not what is happening here.

> I read the FAQ you posted, having you writing in that FAQ that this is
> not a change to license terms is not enough.

Really?  Why not?  According to whom?  {hint, not according to all of
the legal people I have worked with on this topic, and it was a boatload
of them...}

> Modification of GPL V2 terms are explicitly disallowed.

Again, we are not modifying the license, so all should be fine, thanks
for agreeing!

greg k-h