[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171020074829.GA9010@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 09:48:29 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Andrei Vagin <avagin@...tuozzo.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...il.com>,
Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [1/2,v2] fdmap(2)
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 05:34:35PM +0200, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> So the answer it not to fix /proc, the answer it to leave /proc alone.
No, because:
> The answer is make Unix shell people move their lazy asses and
> implement minimal type system and a way to execute raw system calls
> like all normal programming languages do. They still haven't done it
> after dozens of years and are arrogant enough to say "oh uh we can't
> use cat and pipe to awk".
Have you submitted changes and patches to those projects in order to
implement such a thing?
If not, just complaining about it isn't going to change anything, you
know better than that :)
sorry,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists