[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mqdr2typ5uw.fsf@linux-x5ow.site>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 10:43:03 +0200
From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
To: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, james.bottomley@...senpartnership.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp, mingo@...hat.com, clm@...com,
jbacik@...com, dsterba@...e.com, keescook@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] v4 block refcount conversion patches
Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com> writes:
> Elena Reshetova (6):
> block: convert bio.__bi_cnt from atomic_t to refcount_t
> block: convert blk_queue_tag.refcnt from atomic_t to refcount_t
> block: convert blkcg_gq.refcnt from atomic_t to refcount_t
> block: convert io_context.active_ref from atomic_t to refcount_t
> block: convert bsg_device.ref_count from atomic_t to refcount_t
> drivers, block: convert xen_blkif.refcnt from atomic_t to refcount_t
Hi Elena,
While the bsg ref_count is cheap, do you have any numbers how the other
conversions compare in performance (throughput and latency) vs atomics?
It should be quite easy to measure against a null_blk device.
Thanks a lot,
Johannes
--
Johannes Thumshirn Storage
jthumshirn@...e.de +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
Powered by blists - more mailing lists