[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c0959282-17b2-29f0-c817-281f0e80109e@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 11:46:32 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: David Kozub <zub@...ux.fjfi.cvut.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clockevents/drivers/cs5535: improve resilience to
spurious interrupts
On 20/10/2017 11:40, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2017, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 20/10/2017 09:49, David Kozub wrote:
>>
>> And it ends up to the bad commit (assuming there are no compilation
>> broken patches in the process).
>
> I don't think it's worth the trouble for this particular issue. We already
> know that the commit which made the spurious detection weaker. So we just
> add that as Fixes tag and be done with it.
Yes, I'm fine with that.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists