[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1710191840040.27209@sstabellini-ThinkPad-X260>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 18:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
xen-devel@...ts.xen.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jgross@...e.com, Stefano Stabellini <stefano@...reto.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/13] xen/pvcalls: implement sendmsg
On Tue, 17 Oct 2017, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > +static int __write_ring(struct pvcalls_data_intf *intf,
> > + struct pvcalls_data *data,
> > + struct iov_iter *msg_iter,
> > + int len)
> > +{
> > + RING_IDX cons, prod, size, masked_prod, masked_cons;
> > + RING_IDX array_size = XEN_FLEX_RING_SIZE(PVCALLS_RING_ORDER);
> > + int32_t error;
> > +
> > + error = intf->out_error;
> > + if (error < 0)
> > + return error;
> > + cons = intf->out_cons;
> > + prod = intf->out_prod;
> > + /* read indexes before continuing */
> > + virt_mb();
> > +
> > + size = pvcalls_queued(prod, cons, array_size);
> > + if (size >= array_size)
> > + return 0;
>
>
> I thought you were going to return an error here? If this can only be
> due to someone messing up indexes is there a reason to continue trying
> to write? What are the chances that the index will get corrected?
Sorry, I forgot. I'll change it to return an error, maybe EFAULT.
> > + if (len > array_size - size)
> > + len = array_size - size;
> > +
> > + masked_prod = pvcalls_mask(prod, array_size);
> > + masked_cons = pvcalls_mask(cons, array_size);
> > +
> > + if (masked_prod < masked_cons) {
> > + copy_from_iter(data->out + masked_prod, len, msg_iter);
> > + } else {
> > + if (len > array_size - masked_prod) {
> > + copy_from_iter(data->out + masked_prod,
> > + array_size - masked_prod, msg_iter);
> > + copy_from_iter(data->out,
> > + len - (array_size - masked_prod),
> > + msg_iter);
> > + } else {
> > + copy_from_iter(data->out + masked_prod, len, msg_iter);
> > + }
> > + }
> > + /* write to ring before updating pointer */
> > + virt_wmb();
> > + intf->out_prod += len;
> > +
> > + return len;
> > +}
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists