lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 12:47:26 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, Mark <broonie@...nel.org>, Takashi <tiwai@...e.de>, Pierre <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>, Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>, Shreyas NC <shreyas.nc@...el.com>, patches.audio@...el.com, alan@...ux.intel.com, Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>, Sagar Dharia <sdharia@...eaurora.org>, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, plai@...eaurora.org, Sudheer Papothi <spapothi@...eaurora.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/14] soundwire: Add Master registration On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 08:33:19AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > +void sdw_extract_slave_id(struct sdw_bus *bus, > + unsigned long long addr, struct sdw_slave_id *id) > +{ > + dev_dbg(bus->dev, "SDW Slave Addr: %llx", addr); > + > + /* > + * Spec definition > + * Register Bit Contents > + * DevId_0 [7:4] 47:44 sdw_version > + * DevId_0 [3:0] 43:40 unique_id > + * DevId_1 39:32 mfg_id [15:8] > + * DevId_2 31:24 mfg_id [7:0] > + * DevId_3 23:16 part_id [15:8] > + * DevId_4 15:08 part_id [7:0] > + * DevId_5 07:00 class_id > + */ > + id->sdw_version = (addr >> 44) & GENMASK(3, 0); > + id->unique_id = (addr >> 40) & GENMASK(3, 0); > + id->mfg_id = (addr >> 24) & GENMASK(15, 0); > + id->part_id = (addr >> 8) & GENMASK(15, 0); > + id->class_id = addr & GENMASK(7, 0); > + > + dev_info(bus->dev, > + "SDW Slave class_id %x, part_id %x, mfg_id %x, unique_id %x, version %x", > + id->class_id, id->part_id, id->mfg_id, > + id->unique_id, id->sdw_version); > + Why are you so noisy? Shouldn't this be dev_dbg()? > +static void sdw_slave_release(struct device *dev) > +{ > + struct sdw_slave *slave = dev_to_sdw_dev(dev); > + > + kfree(slave); > +} Ah, finally a release function, nice. But that's all you need to do for it? thanks, greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists