[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4410e062-f874-993d-d390-6996321d77cc@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 17:10:37 +0530
From: Manu Gautam <mgautam@...eaurora.org>
To: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] usb: dwc3: of-simple: Add support to get resets for
the device
Hi,
On 10/19/2017 5:17 PM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> From: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>
>
> Add support to get a list of resets available for the device.
> These resets must be kept de-asserted until the device is
> in use.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>
> [p.zabel@...gutronix.de: switch to hidden reset control array]
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
> ---
> v7: Rebased onto git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/balbi/usb.git testing/next
> ---
> drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-of-simple.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-of-simple.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-of-simple.c
> index e129c32780818..ceea1619f8aa3 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-of-simple.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-of-simple.c
> @@ -28,11 +28,13 @@
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> +#include <linux/reset.h>
>
> struct dwc3_of_simple {
> struct device *dev;
> struct clk **clks;
> int num_clocks;
> + struct reset_control *resets;
> };
>
> static int dwc3_of_simple_clk_init(struct dwc3_of_simple *simple, int count)
> @@ -95,10 +97,21 @@ static int dwc3_of_simple_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, simple);
> simple->dev = dev;
>
> + simple->resets = of_reset_control_array_get_optional_exclusive(np);
> + if (IS_ERR(simple->resets)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(simple->resets);
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get device resets, err=%d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = reset_control_deassert(simple->resets);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_resetc_put;
> +
Are these reset signals asserted by default after power on?
I think correct way to handle this should be to have explicit reset_control_assert
before deassert.
> ret = dwc3_of_simple_clk_init(simple, of_count_phandle_with_args(np,
> "clocks", "#clock-cells"));
> if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + goto err_resetc_assert;
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists