[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171020122218.fwxtr5n2q7ixszpl@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 14:22:18 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Ian McDonald <ian.mcdonald@...di.co.nz>,
Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH -tip 0/5] kprobes: Abolish jprobe APIs
Ok, could we now also fix these:
net/dccp/probe.c:166:2: warning: ‘register_jprobe’ is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
net/dccp/probe.c:170:4: warning: ‘register_jprobe’ is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
net/dccp/probe.c:190:2: warning: ‘unregister_jprobe’ is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c:317:3: warning: ‘unregister_jprobe’ is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c:322:2: warning: ‘register_jprobe’ is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c:560:3: warning: ‘unregister_jprobe’ is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
net/sctp/probe.c:189:2: warning: ‘register_jprobe’ is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
net/sctp/probe.c:194:3: warning: ‘register_jprobe’ is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
net/sctp/probe.c:240:2: warning: ‘unregister_jprobe’ is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
net/ipv4/tcp_probe.c:280:2: warning: ‘register_jprobe’ is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
net/ipv4/tcp_probe.c:298:2: warning: ‘unregister_jprobe’ is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
I'd suggest removing the networking ones and Cc:-ing it to the networking folks -
I strongly doubt anyone is using that functionality for real.
The LKDTM one Kees had some ideas (patches?) for?
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists