[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1508504312.3128.23.camel@iis-extern.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 12:58:33 +0000
From: "Stahl, Manuel" <manuel.stahl@...-extern.fraunhofer.de>
To: "stephen@...workplumber.org" <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: "hjk@...utronix.de" <hjk@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"sojkam1@....cvut.cz" <sojkam1@....cvut.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] uio: Prefer MSI(X) interrupts in PCI drivers
Hi Greg,
it just uses MSI-X or MSI when available and falls back to legacy IRQ otherwise.
Regards,
Manuel
On Fr, 2017-10-20 at 14:50 +0200, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 07:57:00AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 13:50:44 +0000
> > "Stahl, Manuel" <manuel.stahl@...-extern.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> >
> > > MSI(X) interrupts are not shared between devices. So when available
> > > those should be preferred over legacy interrupts.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Manuel Stahl <manuel.stahl@....fraunhofer.de>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/uio/uio_pci_dmem_genirq.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > > drivers/uio/uio_pci_generic.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
> > > 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > The last time I tried to do MSI-X with pci-generic it got rejected
> > by the maintainer.
>
> Hm, yeah, this would break users today that do not have msi-x, right?
>
> Not good, Manuel, how well did you test this?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists