[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171020132544.GA13783@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 15:25:44 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
James Bottomley <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/7] switch dereference_function_descriptor() to
`unsigned long'
On Thu 2017-10-19 15:50:04, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (10/04/17 10:24), Petr Mladek wrote:
> [..]
> > To make it clear. All these comments are not a big deal and I do
> > not want to invalidate all the acked-by and tested-by just because
> > of them.
> >
> > But please, consider removing this change if we need to do
> > another iteration of this patchset. IMHO, there is no real win
> > and it would just pollute the git history.
>
> I tend to rather keep it. would that cause any problems on your side?
> it saves a ton of ugly casts later in the patch set and lets us to drop
> some casts from the modules code/etc. the patch is here because otherwise
> I had to add a bunch of new casts.
OK, let's keep it.
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists