[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171020143605.GA59685@beast>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 07:36:05 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
Subject: [PATCH] waitid(): Avoid unbalanced user_access_end() on access_ok()
error
As pointed out by Linus and David, the earlier waitid() fix resulted in a
(currently harmless) unbalanced user_access_end() call. This fixes it to
just directly return EFAULT on access_ok() failure.
Fixes: 96ca579a1ecc ("waitid(): Add missing access_ok() checks")
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
---
This seems best to get fixed up now (in the same release where it was
introduced) before it tries to bite us at some later time.
---
kernel/exit.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index cf28528842bc..f6cad39f35df 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -1611,7 +1611,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(waitid, int, which, pid_t, upid, struct siginfo __user *,
return err;
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, infop, sizeof(*infop)))
- goto Efault;
+ return -EFAULT;
user_access_begin();
unsafe_put_user(signo, &infop->si_signo, Efault);
@@ -1739,7 +1739,7 @@ COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE5(waitid,
return err;
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, infop, sizeof(*infop)))
- goto Efault;
+ return -EFAULT;
user_access_begin();
unsafe_put_user(signo, &infop->si_signo, Efault);
--
2.7.4
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists