linux-kernel - Re: rcu kernel-doc issues (4.14-rc1)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f8a88d0b-47f7-24ff-cdae-4828df8e1d7c@infradead.org>
Date:   Fri, 20 Oct 2017 09:53:30 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: rcu kernel-doc issues (4.14-rc1)

On 10/20/17 09:42, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:36:47AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 09:27:01 -0700
>> "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On a related topic...  Is there anything that test-builds docbook prior
>>> to patches hitting mainline?  My experience indicates that the answer is
>>> "no".
>>
>> The zero-day robot is said to be testing for new doc-build errors, but I
>> haven't actually seen much of that.
> 
> Well, on the good side, Linus did take the fixes.  I will leave it
> to you guys to sort things as needed with Fengguang.  ;-)

Thanks.

-- 
~Randy