[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171020182448.GE12298@voyager>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 11:24:48 -0700
From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Chen Yucong <slaoub@...il.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, ricardo.neri@...el.com,
Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@...il.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>,
Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 19/29] x86/insn-eval: Add support to resolve 32-bit
address encodings
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 07:12:30PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 08:54:22PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > The new function get_addr_ref_32() is almost identical to the existing
> > function insn_get_addr_ref() (used for 64-bit addresses); except for the
> > differences mentioned above. For the sake of simplicity and readability,
> > it is better to use two separate functions.
>
> You're kidding, right?
>
> You're not adding another small function - this new one is just as big. And
> almost identical.
>
> So if you split the whole handling into helpers - for example, each
> if-clause is doing very similar things - you can carve out the repeating
> pieces into helpers and then call them each time with the respective
> parameters, you can get rid of all that needless duplication.
I will create these helper functions. This change and your suggestion in
patch 18 will impact other patches in the series (e.g., the function
get_addr_ref_16() in patch 22). Would it make sense to submit a v10 and
resume review there?
Also, do you think I am still on-time to make it to v4.15?
Thanks and BR,
Ricardo
>
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
> Boris.
>
> SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
> --
Powered by blists - more mailing lists