[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171020190754.GA24332@embeddedor.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 14:07:54 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm: list_lru: mark expected switch fall-through
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
---
This code was tested by compilation only (GCC 7.2.0 was used).
Please, verify if the actual intention of the code is to fall through.
mm/list_lru.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/mm/list_lru.c b/mm/list_lru.c
index f8c7de8..278db98 100644
--- a/mm/list_lru.c
+++ b/mm/list_lru.c
@@ -222,6 +222,7 @@ __list_lru_walk_one(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, int memcg_idx,
switch (ret) {
case LRU_REMOVED_RETRY:
assert_spin_locked(&nlru->lock);
+ /* fall through */
case LRU_REMOVED:
isolated++;
nlru->nr_items--;
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists