[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADtm3G5utU_-6+FMqnxN0LYJggLhSe7Q6V5LbwchLQLe5zVing@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 17:54:16 -0700
From: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@...il.com>
To: Doug Berger <opendmb@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] gpio: brcmstb: implement suspend/resume/shutdown
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Doug Berger <opendmb@...il.com> wrote:
>>> +static int brcmstb_gpio_resume(struct device *dev)
>>> +{
>>> + struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>> + struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank;
>>> + u32 wake_mask = 0;
>>
>> This isn't really being used as a mask, contrary to appearances. It's
>> just tracking whether any active IRQs were seen. Please change to use a
>> bool instead and adjust the name accordingly.
>>
>
> I see your point, but I believe it is cleaner to use this to consolidate
> the bit masks returned by each __brcmstb_gpio_get_active_irqs() call.
> This allows a single test rather than a test per bank.
What about something like this?
bool need_wakeup_event = false;
list_for_each_entry(bank, &priv->bank_list, node) {
need_wakeup_event |= !!__brcmstb_gpio_get_active_irqs(bank);
brcmstb_gpio_bank_restore(priv, bank);
}
if (priv->parent_wake_irq && need_wakeup_event)
pm_wakeup_event(dev, 0);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists