[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5845e6bc-52a6-57ef-a5d3-5c5182b19e53@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 12:13:21 +0200
From: Auger Eric <eric.auger@...hat.com>
To: Christoffer Dall <cdall@...aro.org>
Cc: eric.auger.pro@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
marc.zyngier@....com, peter.maydell@...aro.org,
andre.przywara@....com, wanghaibin.wang@...wei.com,
wu.wubin@...wei.com, drjones@...hat.com, wei@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/11] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: free caches when
GITS_BASER Valid bit is cleared
Hi Christoffer,
On 18/10/2017 00:34, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 09:10:07AM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
>> When the GITS_BASER<n>.Valid gets cleared, the data structures in
>> guest RAM are not valid anymore. The device, collection
>> and LPI lists stored in the in-kernel ITS represent the same
>> information in some form of cache. So let's void the cache.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> v2 -> v3:
>> - add a comment and clear cache in if block
>> ---
>> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
>> index f3f0026f..084239c 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
>> @@ -1471,8 +1471,9 @@ static void vgic_mmio_write_its_baser(struct kvm *kvm,
>> unsigned long val)
>> {
>> const struct vgic_its_abi *abi = vgic_its_get_abi(its);
>> - u64 entry_size, device_type;
>> + u64 entry_size;
>> u64 reg, *regptr, clearbits = 0;
>> + int type;
>>
>> /* When GITS_CTLR.Enable is 1, we ignore write accesses. */
>> if (its->enabled)
>> @@ -1482,12 +1483,12 @@ static void vgic_mmio_write_its_baser(struct kvm *kvm,
>> case 0:
>> regptr = &its->baser_device_table;
>> entry_size = abi->dte_esz;
>> - device_type = GITS_BASER_TYPE_DEVICE;
>> + type = GITS_BASER_TYPE_DEVICE;
>> break;
>> case 1:
>> regptr = &its->baser_coll_table;
>> entry_size = abi->cte_esz;
>> - device_type = GITS_BASER_TYPE_COLLECTION;
>> + type = GITS_BASER_TYPE_COLLECTION;
>> clearbits = GITS_BASER_INDIRECT;
>> break;
>> default:
>> @@ -1499,10 +1500,24 @@ static void vgic_mmio_write_its_baser(struct kvm *kvm,
>> reg &= ~clearbits;
>>
>> reg |= (entry_size - 1) << GITS_BASER_ENTRY_SIZE_SHIFT;
>> - reg |= device_type << GITS_BASER_TYPE_SHIFT;
>> + reg |= (u64)type << GITS_BASER_TYPE_SHIFT;
>> reg = vgic_sanitise_its_baser(reg);
>>
>> *regptr = reg;
>> +
>> + /* Table no longer valid: clear cached data */
>> + if (!(reg & GITS_BASER_VALID)) {
>> + switch (type) {
>> + case GITS_BASER_TYPE_DEVICE:
>> + vgic_its_free_device_list(kvm, its);
>> + break;
>> + case GITS_BASER_TYPE_COLLECTION:
>> + vgic_its_free_collection_list(kvm, its);
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>
> So we do this after setting the *regptr, which makes we worried about
> races.
>
> How are guest writes to these registers synchronized with, for example
> trying to save the tables. Perhaps we don't care because userspace
> should have stopped the VM before trying to save the ITS state?
Yes save & restore can happen only if all vcpus are locked. Same for
user space accesses.
Thanks
Eric
>
>
>
>> }
>>
>> static unsigned long vgic_mmio_read_its_ctlr(struct kvm *vcpu,
>> --
>> 2.5.5
>>
>
> Otherwise looks good to me.
> -Christoffer
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists