linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: Fix zImage file size not aligned with CONFIG_EFI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu9cgt0sjW_pnaXN6J8j8BXAb7z+gLhDY3oMaKwK5vcO-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 22 Oct 2017 14:01:51 +0100
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        chris.zhong@...k-chips.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Fix zImage file size not aligned with
 CONFIG_EFI_STUB enabled

On 22 October 2017 at 13:47, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 12:01:13PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 18 October 2017 at 06:01, Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com> wrote:
>> > The zImage file size should be aligned.
>> >
>> > Fixes: e4bae4d0b5f3 ("arm/efi: Split zImage code and data into separate PE/COFF sections")
>> > Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>
>> > ---
>> >
>> >  arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S | 8 ++++----
>> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S
>> > index b38dcef90756..1636fa259577 100644
>> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S
>> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S
>> > @@ -70,10 +70,6 @@ SECTIONS
>> >    .got                 : { *(.got) }
>> >    _got_end = .;
>> >
>> > -  /* ensure the zImage file size is always a multiple of 64 bits */
>> > -  /* (without a dummy byte, ld just ignores the empty section) */
>> > -  .pad                 : { BYTE(0); . = ALIGN(8); }
>> > -
>> >  #ifdef CONFIG_EFI_STUB
>> >    .data : ALIGN(4096) {
>> >      __pecoff_data_start = .;
>> > @@ -93,6 +89,10 @@ SECTIONS
>> >    __pecoff_data_rawsize = . - ADDR(.data);
>> >  #endif
>> >
>> > +  /* ensure the zImage file size is always a multiple of 64 bits */
>> > +  /* (without a dummy byte, ld just ignores the empty section) */
>> > +  .pad                 : { BYTE(0); . = ALIGN(8); }
>> > +
>> >    _edata = .;
>> >
>> >    _magic_sig = ZIMAGE_MAGIC(0x016f2818);
>> > --
>> > 2.11.0
>> >
>>
>> This is not the right fix. If CONFIG_EFI_STUB is enabled, the zImage
>> filesize should be rounded up to 512 bytes not 8 bytes. The '. =
>> ALIGN(512);' in the .data section appears to ensure that, but for some
>> reason, that appears not to be working.
>
> Actually, the existing .pad section is totally and utterly bogus when
> EFI is enabled:
>
>   . = ALIGN(4);
>   _etext = .;
>
>   .got.plt              : { *(.got.plt) }
>   _got_start = .;
>   .got                  : { *(.got) }
>   _got_end = .;
>
> The .got.plt and .got are always word-based.  This is then followed by
> .pad, which does nothing but pad out to a multiple of 64 bit:
>
>   /* ensure the zImage file size is always a multiple of 64 bits */
>   /* (without a dummy byte, ld just ignores the empty section) */
>   .pad                  : { BYTE(0); . = ALIGN(8); }
>
> So this may add zero or 4 bytes of padding.
>
> This is then followed by the EFI data:
>
>   .data : ALIGN(4096) {
>   ...
>     . = ALIGN(512);
>   }
>
> which is aligned to 4K but aligns the end of itself to 512.
>
> So, we have the end of .got aligned to 4, followed by .pad that tries to
> align to 8, followed by an optional .data section.  This is pointless.
>
> A sane patch would be to choose between the EFI .data section and the
> .pad section.  So, it should be:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_EFI_STUB
>    .data : ALIGN(4096) {
>    ...
>      . = ALIGN(512);
>    }
> #else
>    .pad                 : { BYTE(0); . = ALIGN(8); }
> #endif
>

Agreed, the .pad section has no point for EFI_STUB=y. However, it
seems this symptom is caused by the same issues I am trying to address
here

https://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=150488477807353

which is that we have __ksymtab_xxx sections that we should discard,
because the linker will otherwise emit them /after/ .data or .pad.
This is caused by the use of lib/sort.c in the EFI stub, which
contains an EXPORT_SYMBOL().

Would you perhaps prefer that I clone sort.c into its own .c file
specifically for the EFI stub? (under drivers/firmware/efi/libstub)
That should get rid of these spurious sections and thus the
misalignments and/or movements that are causing all of these issues.