[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAShGckx5Cd_ghrQM49hVGw1vUQVovjYUgqgLjOKXY1fiA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 09:55:12 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/2] gpio: uniphier: UniPhier GPIO driver
Hi Linus,
2017-10-16 17:24 GMT+09:00 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Masahiro Yamada
> <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
>
>> Changes in v8:
>> - Move dt-binding header to binding commit
>> - Add MAINTAINERS entry for the binding doc
>> - Add a consumer example to the binding doc
>
> This v8 looks OK to me.
>
> The stuff is still hard to understand, but that is because the HW is
> very complex and strangely designed, not because of the driver
> author. I really think you did your best, thanks!
>
> I'll wait some days and see if the DT people have something to say
> before applying it, but I'm as happy as I can be I guess.
>
Still waiting for DT people?
As you know, it is almost deadline
of DT pull requests to arm-soc maintainers.
If the driver (and binding) is not applied,
I cannot add GPIO nodes to my DT,
i.e. I would have to wait for one more development cycle
to use GPIO.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists