[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64ed8a02-3158-38b7-b795-efdc7f63e7e5@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 11:17:51 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
user-mode-linux-user@...ts.sourceforge.net,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: um: Use common error handling code in port_listen_fd()
>> Could you become used to the proposed control flow structure
>> in the affected function?
>>
>
> No. Don't do this.
Thanks for your information.
> It's pointless obfuscation.
I disagree for this view.
>> There are some challenges around change acceptance as usual.
>
> Yeah. I knew it was pointless to ask you to stop this... :(
The mixture of agreements and disagreements will evolve over time, won't they?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists