[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=XdWD1dk67yixy+5U7RubxKY2WAh-jhZfTOmb4ndf3b5g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 10:59:02 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>
Cc: Ziyuan Xu <xzy.xu@...k-chips.com>,
Alexandru M Stan <amstan@...omium.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] mmc: dw_mmc: Add locking to the CTO timer
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
> ...
> ...
>> Yes, it looks hard to get concurrency right. I have a comment for your
>> DRTO case(patch 5). Let's do some brainstorm there.
>
> Since your comments in this patch are positive and you've now added
> your Reviewed-by to patch #5, I'm going to assume that you'd also like
> your Reviewed-by on this patch?
>
>
> Jaehoon: I think I have Shawn's review on all this series. It would
> be great if you could review them yourself and/or pick them up in your
> tree. Since they fix a regression on 4.14 we really don't want to
> delay too long. If you're busy, please yell and we can figure out a
> way to get these in (either through Ulf directly or we should find
> someone else to make a git tree and send a pull request).
Ulf: I still haven't heard anything for Jaehoon. Do you have any
interest in landing this series directly to your tree? I think the
whole series has been reviewed by Shawn. I'm happy to re-post with
collected tags or anything else you'd like. It would be nice to get
the regression fixed sooner rather than later...
Thanks! :)
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists