[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171023181339.GA25304@embeddedor.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 13:13:39 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net: rxrpc: call_object: use BUG_ON instead of if condition
followed by BUG
Use BUG_ON instead of if condition followed by BUG in rxrpc_release_call.
This issue was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
---
net/rxrpc/call_object.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/call_object.c b/net/rxrpc/call_object.c
index fcdd655..b4b1a63 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/call_object.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/call_object.c
@@ -457,8 +457,7 @@ void rxrpc_release_call(struct rxrpc_sock *rx, struct rxrpc_call *call)
ASSERTCMP(call->state, ==, RXRPC_CALL_COMPLETE);
spin_lock_bh(&call->lock);
- if (test_and_set_bit(RXRPC_CALL_RELEASED, &call->flags))
- BUG();
+ BUG_ON(test_and_set_bit(RXRPC_CALL_RELEASED, &call->flags));
spin_unlock_bh(&call->lock);
del_timer_sync(&call->timer);
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists