linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Documentation: Add a file explaining the requested Linux kernel license enforcement policy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <20171023174711.GA1869@zrhn9910b>
Date:   Mon, 23 Oct 2017 19:47:12 +0200
From:   Damian Tometzki <damian.tometzki@...oud.com>
To:     Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Pavel Nikulin <nikulinpi@...il.com>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Documentation: Add a file explaining the requested
 Linux kernel license enforcement policy

Hello all,

i'am new in the community. For me the intention of the document is clear but is very spongy written. 
It leaves a lot of interpretations and unclear to me. 
Who is the community and who is we ? The names in the document ? In my opinion, the list is incomplete or is that the community ?
And what are with all the other people's where contribute to the community. Many of the people's in the document work in a company which also has the interest in further development.

Nevertheless, I will also try to make my contribution as a private person and in  my free time after work. 
Even if the entry is not made easy if one is not working with the well-known company. 

-Damian- 

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)