[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALAqxLVzzypXaNqjqdn3cDr89jXQrQrfD7w8JfNhFKc=eJTHrg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 13:41:02 -0700
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: Minas Harutyunyan <Minas.Harutyunyan@...opsys.com>
Cc: John Youn <John.Youn@...opsys.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@...aro.org>,
Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@...aro.org>,
YongQin Liu <yongqin.liu@...aro.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Chen Yu <chenyu56@...wei.com>,
Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND x2][PATCH 0/3] dwc2 fixes for edge cases on hikey
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 2:19 AM, Minas Harutyunyan
<Minas.Harutyunyan@...opsys.com> wrote:
> Could you please verify on your setup follow patches:
> 1. Vardan's patch.
> 2. Patch for TOUTCAL&USBTRDTIM programming (new version see below).
> 4. Your patch 2/3 to avoid "Mode Mismatch" interrupts.
> 5. Your patch 3/3 to set udc state to "not attached".
> 6. Your patch 1/3, but remove dwc2_hsotg_core_init_disconnected()
> function call from Host starting brnch, keep *only*
> dwc2_hsotg_disconnect() to change UDC state to "not attached".
So yes, this set does seem to work ok for me. Though neither Vardan's
patch or the TOUTCAL/USBTRDTIM patch seem to have much effect either
way (I need to do more testing just to be sure, but for the use cases
I've had trouble with they don't seem to do much).
I'm happy to rework my earlier patch #1/3 to remove
dwc2_hsotg_core_init_disconnected() and resend.
thanks
-john
Powered by blists - more mailing lists