[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1508792849-3115-6-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:07:16 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: mingo@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
will.deacon@....com, mark.rutland@....com, snitzer@...hat.com,
thor.thayer@...ux.intel.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
davem@...emloft.net, shuah@...nel.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
tj@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 06/19] media: dvb_ringbuffer: Kill off ACCESS_ONCE()
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
For several reasons, it is desirable to use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() in
preference to ACCESS_ONCE(), and new code is expected to use one of the
former. So far, there's been no reason to change most existing uses of
ACCESS_ONCE(), as these aren't currently harmful.
However, for some features it is necessary to instrument reads and
writes separately, which is not possible with ACCESS_ONCE(). This
distinction is critical to correct operation.
It's possible to transform the bulk of kernel code using the Coccinelle
script below. However, this doesn't handle comments, leaving references
to ACCESS_ONCE() instances which have been removed. As a preparatory
step, this patch converts the DVB ringbuffer code and comments to use
{READ,WRITE}_ONCE() consistently.
----
virtual patch
@ depends on patch @
expression E1, E2;
@@
- ACCESS_ONCE(E1) = E2
+ WRITE_ONCE(E1, E2)
@ depends on patch @
expression E;
@@
- ACCESS_ONCE(E)
+ READ_ONCE(E)
----
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
---
drivers/media/dvb-core/dvb_ringbuffer.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb-core/dvb_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/media/dvb-core/dvb_ringbuffer.c
index 2322af1b8742..53011629c9ad 100644
--- a/drivers/media/dvb-core/dvb_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/media/dvb-core/dvb_ringbuffer.c
@@ -66,12 +66,12 @@ ssize_t dvb_ringbuffer_free(struct dvb_ringbuffer *rbuf)
{
ssize_t free;
- /* ACCESS_ONCE() to load read pointer on writer side
+ /* READ_ONCE() to load read pointer on writer side
* this pairs with smp_store_release() in dvb_ringbuffer_read(),
* dvb_ringbuffer_read_user(), dvb_ringbuffer_flush(),
* or dvb_ringbuffer_reset()
*/
- free = ACCESS_ONCE(rbuf->pread) - rbuf->pwrite;
+ free = READ_ONCE(rbuf->pread) - rbuf->pwrite;
if (free <= 0)
free += rbuf->size;
return free-1;
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ ssize_t dvb_ringbuffer_read_user(struct dvb_ringbuffer *rbuf, u8 __user *buf, si
todo -= split;
/* smp_store_release() for read pointer update to ensure
* that buf is not overwritten until read is complete,
- * this pairs with ACCESS_ONCE() in dvb_ringbuffer_free()
+ * this pairs with READ_ONCE() in dvb_ringbuffer_free()
*/
smp_store_release(&rbuf->pread, 0);
}
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ void dvb_ringbuffer_read(struct dvb_ringbuffer *rbuf, u8 *buf, size_t len)
todo -= split;
/* smp_store_release() for read pointer update to ensure
* that buf is not overwritten until read is complete,
- * this pairs with ACCESS_ONCE() in dvb_ringbuffer_free()
+ * this pairs with READ_ONCE() in dvb_ringbuffer_free()
*/
smp_store_release(&rbuf->pread, 0);
}
--
2.5.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists