[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171023212741.GA12782@amd>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 23:27:41 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: 4.14-rc2 on thinkpad x220: out of memory when inserting mmc card
On Mon 2017-10-23 14:16:40, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
>
> >> > Thinkpad X220... how do I tell if I was using them? I believe so,
> >> > because I uncovered bug in them before.
> >>
> >> You are certainly using bounce buffers. What does lspci -knn show?
> >
> > Here is the output:
> > 0d:00.0 System peripheral [0880]: Ricoh Co Ltd PCIe SDXC/MMC Host Controller [1180:e823] (rev 07)
> > Subsystem: Lenovo Device [17aa:21da]
> > Kernel driver in use: sdhci-pci
>
> So that is a Ricoh driver, one of the few that was supposed to benefit
> from bounce buffers.
>
> Except that if you actually turned it on:
> > [10994.302196] kworker/2:1: page allocation failure: order:4,
> so it doesn't have enough memory to use these bounce buffers
> anyway.
Well, look at archives: driver failed completely when allocation failed.
> I'm now feel it was the right thing to delete them.
Which means I may have been geting benefit -- when it worked. I
believe solution is to allocate at driver probing time.
(OTOH ... SPI is slow compared to rest of the system, right? Where
does the benefit come from?)
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists