[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171023045342.GA23082@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 13:53:42 +0900
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, pali.rohar@...il.com, sre@...nel.org,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, khilman@...nel.org,
aaro.koskinen@....fi, ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com,
patrikbachan@...il.com, serge@...lyn.com, abcloriens@...il.com,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: n900 in next-20170901
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 10:31:47AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com> [171019 18:53]:
> > Oops... I made a mistak. Could you test with reverting commit
> > c977ee2803787363187d6aca9cebdabc793c6531 ("omap: forcibly call
> > save_secure_ram_context() for test") in that branch?
> > Without reverting it, it doesn't call 'smc' so it always cause a
> > hang.
>
> Oops I should have noticed that one. Here you go with commit
> c977ee280378 reverted. Still not booting.
Still very thanks to you. :)
Okay. Could you test my updated branch? In there, I also disable
atomic_pool initialization and disable to remap the CMA area in order
to completely make any operation on CMA area as no-op.
And, it enables memblock_debug to check how memblock region is
allocated.
https://github.com/JoonsooKim/linux/tree/cma-debug4-next-20180901
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists