linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] extcon: max14577: Use common error handling code in max14577_muic_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <59ED83FA.5000701@samsung.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:54:02 +0900
From:   Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
To:     SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] extcon: max14577: Use common error handling code in
 max14577_muic_set_path()

On 2017년 10월 23일 14:45, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>> As you commented, this patch might remove the redundant error message.
>> But, it makes the code more complicated in side of readability.
> 
> Do you try to avoid duplicated code any more in other circumstances?

I usually used the goto statement on following cases:
- Return the value (error number if fail or 0 if success)
- Do free or unregister or remove operations when error happen.

I think that there is any benefit of this patch.
Also, as I commented, it make the code more complicated.

-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics