linux-kernel - Re: extcon: max14577: Use common error handling code in max14577_muic_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d0cc81a4-6301-13ee-1589-e8a95813f106@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:   Mon, 23 Oct 2017 08:08:43 +0200
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: extcon: max14577: Use common error handling code in
 max14577_muic_set_path()

>>> I think that there is any benefit of this patch.
>>> Also, as I commented, it make the code more complicated.
>>
>> We have got different software development opinions about
> 
> I agree absolutely. So, anyone can suggest the opinion and send patches.
> But, all patches have to get the review from maintainer, reviewer
> or the mailing-list developer.

Can an other change acceptance evolve over time?


> (Please don't remove the part of my comment when you reply.)
> 
>> the shown change possibilities then.

Do you find similar updates more useful for any other software modules?

Regards,
Markus