[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <150872002972.3340.9372825368625571993.stgit@noble>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 11:53:49 +1100
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
To: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/9] staging: lustre: ldlm: remove unused 'overlaps' variable
'overlaps' is never used, only incremented.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c
index 2d1fa2b33129..d5a5742a1171 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c
@@ -133,7 +133,6 @@ static int ldlm_process_flock_lock(struct ldlm_lock *req)
struct ldlm_lock *new2 = NULL;
enum ldlm_mode mode = req->l_req_mode;
int added = (mode == LCK_NL);
- int overlaps = 0;
int splitted = 0;
const struct ldlm_callback_suite null_cbs = { };
@@ -226,8 +225,6 @@ static int ldlm_process_flock_lock(struct ldlm_lock *req)
lock->l_policy_data.l_flock.start)
break;
- ++overlaps;
-
if (new->l_policy_data.l_flock.start <=
lock->l_policy_data.l_flock.start) {
if (new->l_policy_data.l_flock.end <
Powered by blists - more mailing lists