linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 11/41] KEYS: fix writing past end of user-supplied buffer in keyring

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171024231927.GA32603@google.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 Oct 2017 16:19:27 -0700
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:     Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 11/41] KEYS: fix writing past end of user-supplied
 buffer in keyring_read()

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 04:27:23PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Ben, thanks for pointing this out.  I had assumed the "obvious" semantics,
> > but it turns out that's not what's documented.
> 
> The manpage is correct.  keyctl_read_alloc() in libkeyutils relies on the
> behaviour documented there with respect to the full size of the data always
> being returned, even if the buffer was too small.
> 
> The keyring cannot be modified whilst it is being read, so that's not a
> concern.
> 
> keyctl_read_alloc() doesn't care if the buffer actually gets written to or
> not, but it's best to honour the manpage.
> 
> David

I'd like to fix this, but I still can't decide whether keyring_read() should
fill the buffer or not.  In keyutils, keyctl_read_alloc() doesn't care, but
keyctl_read() on a keyring is also called from dump_key_tree_aux().  And that
*does* assume that the buffer was filled in the event of a short read ---
although it can only happen if the keyring is added to concurrently, and even
then it's still broken because dump_key_tree_aux() won't show everything in the
keyring.

So do we really make it keep filling the buffer, even though that contradicts
the man page?

Eric