lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 24 Oct 2017 03:17:56 -0700
From:   tip-bot for Rakib Mullick <tipbot@...or.com>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     mingo@...nel.org, rakib.mullick@...il.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, hpa@...or.com
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched/isolcpus: Fix "isolcpus=" boot parameter
 handling when !CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK

Commit-ID:  e22cdc3fc5991956146b9856d36b4971fe54dcd6
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/e22cdc3fc5991956146b9856d36b4971fe54dcd6
Author:     Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 19:01:54 +0600
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 11:47:25 +0200

sched/isolcpus: Fix "isolcpus=" boot parameter handling when !CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK

cpulist_parse() uses nr_cpumask_bits as a limit to parse the
passed buffer from kernel commandline. What nr_cpumask_bits
represents varies depending upon the CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK option:

 - If CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n, then nr_cpumask_bits is the same as
   NR_CPUS, which might not represent the # of CPUs that really exist
   (default 64). So, there's a chance of a gap between nr_cpu_ids
   and NR_CPUS, which ultimately lead towards invalid cpulist_parse()
   operation. For example, if isolcpus=9 is passed on an 8 cpu
   system (CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n) it doesn't show the error
   that it's supposed to.

This patch fixes this bug by finding the last CPU of the passed
isolcpus= list and checking it against nr_cpu_ids.

It also fixes the error message where the nr_cpu_ids should be
nr_cpu_ids-1, since CPU numbering starts from 0.

Signed-off-by: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: adobriyan@...il.com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: longman@...hat.com
Cc: mka@...omium.org
Cc: tj@...nel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171023130154.9050-1-rakib.mullick@gmail.com
[ Enhanced the changelog and the kernel message. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>

 include/linux/cpumask.h |   16 ++++++++++++++++
 kernel/sched/topology.c |    4 ++--
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
 include/linux/cpumask.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 kernel/sched/topology.c |  4 ++--
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
index cd415b7..63661de 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
@@ -130,6 +130,11 @@ static inline unsigned int cpumask_first(const struct cpumask *srcp)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static inline unsigned int cpumask_last(const struct cpumask *srcp)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /* Valid inputs for n are -1 and 0. */
 static inline unsigned int cpumask_next(int n, const struct cpumask *srcp)
 {
@@ -178,6 +183,17 @@ static inline unsigned int cpumask_first(const struct cpumask *srcp)
 	return find_first_bit(cpumask_bits(srcp), nr_cpumask_bits);
 }
 
+/**
+ * cpumask_last - get the last CPU in a cpumask
+ * @srcp:	- the cpumask pointer
+ *
+ * Returns	>= nr_cpumask_bits if no CPUs set.
+ */
+static inline unsigned int cpumask_last(const struct cpumask *srcp)
+{
+	return find_last_bit(cpumask_bits(srcp), nr_cpumask_bits);
+}
+
 unsigned int cpumask_next(int n, const struct cpumask *srcp);
 
 /**
diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
index e50450c..e3d31b0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
@@ -476,8 +476,8 @@ static int __init isolated_cpu_setup(char *str)
 
 	alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var(&cpu_isolated_map);
 	ret = cpulist_parse(str, cpu_isolated_map);
-	if (ret) {
-		pr_err("sched: Error, all isolcpus= values must be between 0 and %u\n", nr_cpu_ids);
+	if (ret || cpumask_last(cpu_isolated_map) >= nr_cpu_ids) {
+		pr_err("sched: Error, all isolcpus= values must be between 0 and %u - ignoring them.\n", nr_cpu_ids-1);
 		return 0;
 	}
 	return 1;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ