[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171024125729.345028652@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 15:03:49 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Eryu Guan <eguan@...hat.com>,
Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 36/48] xfs: report zeroed or not correctly in xfs_zero_range()
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eryu Guan <eguan@...hat.com>
commit d20a5e3851969fa685f118a80e4df670255a4e8d upstream.
The 'did_zero' param of xfs_zero_range() was not passed to
iomap_zero_range() correctly. This was introduced by commit
7bb41db3ea16 ("xfs: handle 64-bit length in xfs_iozero"), and found
by code inspection.
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ xfs_zero_range(
xfs_off_t count,
bool *did_zero)
{
- return iomap_zero_range(VFS_I(ip), pos, count, NULL, &xfs_iomap_ops);
+ return iomap_zero_range(VFS_I(ip), pos, count, did_zero, &xfs_iomap_ops);
}
int
Powered by blists - more mailing lists