[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171024125654.600259543@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 15:06:48 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Subject: [PATCH 4.13 14/85] parisc: Fix detection of nonsynchronous cr16 cycle counters
4.13-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
commit 8642b31ba9eef8a01845146a26682d4869e62513 upstream.
For CPUs which have an unknown or invalid CPU location (physical location)
assume that their cycle counters aren't syncronized across CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Fixes: c8c3735997a3 ("parisc: Enhance detection of synchronous cr16 clocksources")
Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/parisc/kernel/time.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/parisc/kernel/time.c
+++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/time.c
@@ -253,7 +253,10 @@ static int __init init_cr16_clocksource(
cpu0_loc = per_cpu(cpu_data, 0).cpu_loc;
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
- if (cpu0_loc == per_cpu(cpu_data, cpu).cpu_loc)
+ if (cpu == 0)
+ continue;
+ if ((cpu0_loc != 0) &&
+ (cpu0_loc == per_cpu(cpu_data, cpu).cpu_loc))
continue;
clocksource_cr16.name = "cr16_unstable";
Powered by blists - more mailing lists