[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171024133535.GC13445@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 14:35:35 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
mark.rutland@....com, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, robh@...nel.org,
suzuki.poulose@....com, pawel.moll@....com,
mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] perf tool: Introduce arch-specific supplemental perf
open strerror capability
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 03:04:04AM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:
> Introduce new tools/perf/arch/*/util/evsel.c:perf_evsel__suppl_strerror()
> so each arch can start to customize usability for its h/w PMU drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>
> ---
> tools/perf/arch/x86/util/Build | 1 +
> tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evsel.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
> tools/perf/util/evsel.h | 2 ++
> 4 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evsel.c
This looks sensible to me, although it's difficult to justify all of the
parameters to perf_evsel__suppl_strerror judging by this patch alone.
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists