[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171024134556.2gjh7nd3nfmaf4ct@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 15:45:56 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander.Steffen@...ineon.com, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterhuewe@....de,
tpmdd@...horst.net, jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com,
patrickc@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] tpm: move wait_for_tpm_stat() to respective
driver files
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 07:02:18PM +0530, Nayna Jain wrote:
>
>
> On 10/20/2017 02:26 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 05:00:29PM +0000, Alexander.Steffen@...ineon.com wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 04:32:29PM -0400, Nayna Jain wrote:
> > > > > The function wait_for_tpm_stat() is currently defined in
> > > > > tpm-interface file. It is a hardware specific function used
> > > > > only by tpm_tis and xen-tpmfront, so it is removed from
> > > > > tpm-interface.c and defined in respective driver files.
> > > > >
> > > > > Suggested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 60 ----------------------------------------
> > > > > drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h | 2 --
> > > > > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 60
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c | 60
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > 4 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-
> > > > interface.c
> > > > > index 1d6729be4cd6..313f7618d569 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
> > > > > @@ -1035,66 +1035,6 @@ int tpm_send(u32 chip_num, void *cmd, size_t
> > > > buflen)
> > > > > }
> > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_send);
> > > > >
> > > > > -static bool wait_for_tpm_stat_cond(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask,
> > > > > - bool check_cancel, bool *canceled)
> > > > > -{
> > > > > - u8 status = chip->ops->status(chip);
> > > > > -
> > > > > - *canceled = false;
> > > > > - if ((status & mask) == mask)
> > > > > - return true;
> > > > > - if (check_cancel && chip->ops->req_canceled(chip, status)) {
> > > > > - *canceled = true;
> > > > > - return true;
> > > > > - }
> > > > > - return false;
> > > > > -}
> > > > > -
> > > > > -int wait_for_tpm_stat(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask, unsigned long
> > > > timeout,
> > > > > - wait_queue_head_t *queue, bool check_cancel)
> > > > > -{
> > > > > - unsigned long stop;
> > > > > - long rc;
> > > > > - u8 status;
> > > > > - bool canceled = false;
> > > > > -
> > > > > - /* check current status */
> > > > > - status = chip->ops->status(chip);
> > > > > - if ((status & mask) == mask)
> > > > > - return 0;
> > > > > -
> > > > > - stop = jiffies + timeout;
> > > > > -
> > > > > - if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ) {
> > > > > -again:
> > > > > - timeout = stop - jiffies;
> > > > > - if ((long)timeout <= 0)
> > > > > - return -ETIME;
> > > > > - rc = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(*queue,
> > > > > - wait_for_tpm_stat_cond(chip, mask, check_cancel,
> > > > > - &canceled),
> > > > > - timeout);
> > > > > - if (rc > 0) {
> > > > > - if (canceled)
> > > > > - return -ECANCELED;
> > > > > - return 0;
> > > > > - }
> > > > > - if (rc == -ERESTARTSYS && freezing(current)) {
> > > > > - clear_thread_flag(TIF_SIGPENDING);
> > > > > - goto again;
> > > > > - }
> > > > > - } else {
> > > > > - do {
> > > > > - tpm_msleep(TPM_TIMEOUT);
> > > > > - status = chip->ops->status(chip);
> > > > > - if ((status & mask) == mask)
> > > > > - return 0;
> > > > > - } while (time_before(jiffies, stop));
> > > > > - }
> > > > > - return -ETIME;
> > > > > -}
> > > > > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wait_for_tpm_stat);
> > > > > -
> > > > > #define TPM_ORD_SAVESTATE 152
> > > > > #define SAVESTATE_RESULT_SIZE 10
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> > > > > index 2d5466a72e40..4fc83ac7abeb 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> > > > > @@ -525,8 +525,6 @@ int tpm_do_selftest(struct tpm_chip *chip);
> > > > > unsigned long tpm_calc_ordinal_duration(struct tpm_chip *chip, u32
> > > > ordinal);
> > > > > int tpm_pm_suspend(struct device *dev);
> > > > > int tpm_pm_resume(struct device *dev);
> > > > > -int wait_for_tpm_stat(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask, unsigned long
> > > > timeout,
> > > > > - wait_queue_head_t *queue, bool check_cancel);
> > > > >
> > > > > static inline void tpm_msleep(unsigned int delay_msec)
> > > > > {
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> > > > b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> > > > > index 63bc6c3b949e..b33126a35694 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> > > > > @@ -31,6 +31,66 @@
> > > > > #include "tpm.h"
> > > > > #include "tpm_tis_core.h"
> > > > >
> > > > > +static bool wait_for_tpm_stat_cond(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask,
> > > > > + bool check_cancel, bool *canceled)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + u8 status = chip->ops->status(chip);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + *canceled = false;
> > > > > + if ((status & mask) == mask)
> > > > > + return true;
> > > > > + if (check_cancel && chip->ops->req_canceled(chip, status)) {
> > > > > + *canceled = true;
> > > > > + return true;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > + return false;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static int wait_for_tpm_stat(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask,
> > > > > + unsigned long timeout, wait_queue_head_t *queue,
> > > > > + bool check_cancel)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + unsigned long stop;
> > > > > + long rc;
> > > > > + u8 status;
> > > > > + bool canceled = false;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + /* check current status */
> > > > > + status = chip->ops->status(chip);
> > > > > + if ((status & mask) == mask)
> > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + stop = jiffies + timeout;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ) {
> > > > > +again:
> > > > > + timeout = stop - jiffies;
> > > > > + if ((long)timeout <= 0)
> > > > > + return -ETIME;
> > > > > + rc = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(*queue,
> > > > > + wait_for_tpm_stat_cond(chip, mask, check_cancel,
> > > > > + &canceled),
> > > > > + timeout);
> > > > > + if (rc > 0) {
> > > > > + if (canceled)
> > > > > + return -ECANCELED;
> > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > + if (rc == -ERESTARTSYS && freezing(current)) {
> > > > > + clear_thread_flag(TIF_SIGPENDING);
> > > > > + goto again;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > + } else {
> > > > > + do {
> > > > > + tpm_msleep(TPM_TIMEOUT);
> > > > > + status = chip->ops->status(chip);
> > > > > + if ((status & mask) == mask)
> > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > + } while (time_before(jiffies, stop));
> > > > > + }
> > > > > + return -ETIME;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > /* Before we attempt to access the TPM we must see that the valid bit is
> > > > set.
> > > > > * The specification says that this bit is 0 at reset and remains 0 until the
> > > > > * 'TPM has gone through its self test and initialization and has established
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c b/drivers/char/tpm/xen-
> > > > tpmfront.c
> > > > > index 656e8af95d52..d20a0a9ded27 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c
> > > > > @@ -39,6 +39,66 @@ enum status_bits {
> > > > > VTPM_STATUS_CANCELED = 0x8,
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > +static bool wait_for_tpm_stat_cond(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask,
> > > > > + bool check_cancel, bool *canceled)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + u8 status = chip->ops->status(chip);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + *canceled = false;
> > > > > + if ((status & mask) == mask)
> > > > > + return true;
> > > > > + if (check_cancel && chip->ops->req_canceled(chip, status)) {
> > > > > + *canceled = true;
> > > > > + return true;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > + return false;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static int wait_for_tpm_stat(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask,
> > > > > + unsigned long timeout, wait_queue_head_t *queue,
> > > > > + bool check_cancel)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + unsigned long stop;
> > > > > + long rc;
> > > > > + u8 status;
> > > > > + bool canceled = false;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + /* check current status */
> > > > > + status = chip->ops->status(chip);
> > > > > + if ((status & mask) == mask)
> > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + stop = jiffies + timeout;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ) {
> > > > > +again:
> > > > > + timeout = stop - jiffies;
> > > > > + if ((long)timeout <= 0)
> > > > > + return -ETIME;
> > > > > + rc = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(*queue,
> > > > > + wait_for_tpm_stat_cond(chip, mask, check_cancel,
> > > > > + &canceled),
> > > > > + timeout);
> > > > > + if (rc > 0) {
> > > > > + if (canceled)
> > > > > + return -ECANCELED;
> > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > + if (rc == -ERESTARTSYS && freezing(current)) {
> > > > > + clear_thread_flag(TIF_SIGPENDING);
> > > > > + goto again;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > + } else {
> > > > > + do {
> > > > > + tpm_msleep(TPM_TIMEOUT);
> > > > > + status = chip->ops->status(chip);
> > > > > + if ((status & mask) == mask)
> > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > + } while (time_before(jiffies, stop));
> > > > > + }
> > > > > + return -ETIME;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > static u8 vtpm_status(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> > > > > {
> > > > > struct tpm_private *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.13.3
> > > > >
> > > > This commit caused a compiler warning because freezer.h was not included
> > > > to xen-tpmfront.c. I manually fixed it.
> > > Yep, and checkpatch.pl still complains about some stuff (mostly
> > > whitespace) in both patch 1/4 and 2/4. When fixed patches are
> > > available, I can run them again through my automation.
> > > Alexander
>
> Sorry for delay in response.. I was on vacation for last few days.
> Thanks for informing. I am wondering these didn't show up when I ran
> checkpatch.pl.
I also did run checkpatch.pl. Haven't had time to recheck yet but I will
do that since there's always chance for human error.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists