linux-kernel - Re: drm/i915/gvt: Use common error handling code in shadow_workload_ring

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 24 Oct 2017 09:14:28 -0600
From:   Daniele Nicolodi <daniele@...nta.net>
To:     SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Garry Hurley <garry.hurley.jr@...il.com>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: drm/i915/gvt: Use common error handling code in
 shadow_workload_ring_buffer()

On 10/24/17 9:01 AM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>>> Do you prefer to delegate the proposed software refactoring
>>> only to a corresponding optimiser?
>>
>> yes.
> 
> Will any applications around the semantic patch language
> (Coccinelle software) fit also in the preferred tool category?

What do you think of quantum computing as a solution instead?

Cheers,
Dan