[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFq23Ak6g0HFRThvwToyxrPHsxZVgyw=BHhASdMMSb9JhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 07:37:43 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bough Chen <haibo.chen@....com>,
Alex Lemberg <alex.lemberg@...disk.com>,
Mateusz Nowak <mateusz.nowak@...el.com>,
Yuliy Izrailov <Yuliy.Izrailov@...disk.com>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
Dong Aisheng <dongas86@...il.com>,
Das Asutosh <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...il.com>,
Sahitya Tummala <stummala@...eaurora.org>,
Harjani Ritesh <riteshh@...eaurora.org>,
Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@...dia.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 00/14] mmc: Add Command Queue support
+ Bartlomiej
[...]
>>>>> So my conclusion is, let's start a as you suggested, by not completing
>>>>> the request in ->done() as to maintain existing behavior. Then we can
>>>>> address optimizations on top, which very likely will involve doing
>>>>> changes to host drivers as well.
>>>>
>>>> Have you tested the latest version now?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ping?
>>
>> Still ping?
>
> How is your silence in any way an acceptable way to execute your
> responsibilities as maintainer!
Seriously? You posted the new version Oct 13.
I had to make some late minute travel decisions, so unfortunate I
won't be able to test this on HW from this Friday.
However, you have completely ignored mine, Linus and Bartlomiej's
comments about that we want the blkmq port being a separate patch(es)
and then make the CMDQ patches on top. This worries me, because it
seems like our messages don't reach you.
Kind regards
Uffe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists