[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1508824691.2639.26.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 07:58:11 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"snitzer@...hat.com" <snitzer@...hat.com>,
"thor.thayer@...ux.intel.com" <thor.thayer@...ux.intel.com>,
"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>,
"mpe@...erman.id.au" <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
"tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>,
"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/19] net: average: Kill off ACCESS_ONCE()
On Mon, 2017-10-23 at 21:07 +0000, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
>
> For several reasons, it is desirable to use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() in
> preference to ACCESS_ONCE(), and new code is expected to use one of the
> former. So far, there's been no reason to change most existing uses of
> ACCESS_ONCE(), as these aren't currently harmful.
>
> However, for some features it is necessary to instrument reads and
> writes separately, which is not possible with ACCESS_ONCE(). This
> distinction is critical to correct operation.
>
> It's possible to transform the bulk of kernel code using the Coccinelle
> script below. However, this doesn't pick up some uses, including those
> in <linux/average.h>. As a preparatory step, this patch converts the
> file to use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() consistently.
>
> At the same time, this patch addds missing includes necessary for
> {READ,WRITE}_ONCE(), *BUG_ON*(), and ilog2().
>
> ----
> virtual patch
>
> @ depends on patch @
> expression E1, E2;
> @@
>
> - ACCESS_ONCE(E1) = E2
> + WRITE_ONCE(E1, E2)
>
> @ depends on patch @
> expression E;
> @@
>
> - ACCESS_ONCE(E)
> + READ_ONCE(E)
> ----
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Let me know if you want me to apply this, since I seem to be the
average.h maintainer :-)
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists