linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH] irq_work: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171025055114.GP3310@X58A-UD3R>
Date:   Wed, 25 Oct 2017 14:51:14 +0900
From:   Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
To:     Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:     peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@....com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] irq_work: Don't reinvent the wheel but use
 existing llist API

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 04:04:17PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 02:29:20PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 09:45:35AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > > Although llist provides proper APIs, they are not used. Make them used.
> > 
> > +to peterz@...radead.org
> > +to mingo@...nel.org
> > +to rostedt@...dmis.org
> > 
> > I am not sure whom should I send this patch to..
> > Could you check this if you are right person?
> 
> I'll take it.

Hello Frederic,

Please let me know if there are some problems with this.

If so, I will request it to others.

Thanks.

> Thanks!