linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] workqueue: Remove unnecessary acquisitions wrt workqueue flush

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171025063512.qvdwo4q7hakeiwqf@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 25 Oct 2017 08:35:12 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
Cc:     peterz@...radead.org, axboe@...nel.dk, johan@...nel.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, tj@...nel.org, johannes.berg@...el.com,
        oleg@...hat.com, amir73il@...il.com, david@...morbit.com,
        darrick.wong@...cle.com, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        hch@...radead.org, idryomov@...il.com, kernel-team@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] workqueue: Remove unnecessary acquisitions wrt
 workqueue flush


* Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com> wrote:

> The workqueue added manual acquisitions to catch deadlock cases.
> Now crossrelease was introduced, some of those are redundant, since
> wait_for_completion() already includes the acquisition for itself.
> Removed it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
> ---
>  include/linux/workqueue.h |  4 ++--
>  kernel/workqueue.c        | 19 +++----------------
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/workqueue.h b/include/linux/workqueue.h
> index f3c47a0..1455b5e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/workqueue.h
> +++ b/include/linux/workqueue.h
> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static inline void destroy_delayed_work_on_stack(struct delayed_work *work) { }
>  									\
>  		__init_work((_work), _onstack);				\
>  		(_work)->data = (atomic_long_t) WORK_DATA_INIT();	\
> -		lockdep_init_map(&(_work)->lockdep_map, #_work, &__key, 0); \
> +		lockdep_init_map(&(_work)->lockdep_map, "(complete)"#_work, &__key, 0); \

This has a similar naming problem as the block bits: should be "wq_completion" or 
such.

Thanks,

	Ingo