linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/48] 4.9.59-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171025070214.GD13386@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 25 Oct 2017 09:02:14 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Tom Gall <tom.gall@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
        shuahkh@....samsung.com, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/48] 4.9.59-stable review

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 05:26:53PM -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
> 
> > On Oct 24, 2017, at 8:03 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > 
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.59 release.
> > There are 48 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Thu Oct 26 12:57:14 UTC 2017.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.59-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> > 
> > -------------
> 
> Results from the Linaro test farm. No regressions observed.

Thanks for the report, but it would still be good to fix those known
failures... :)

thanks,

greg k-h