[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171025070730.GH8550@linux-l9pv.suse>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 15:07:30 +0800
From: joeyli <jlee@...e.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, matthew.garrett@...ula.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jforbes@...hat.com, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Gary Lin <GLin@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/27] bpf: Restrict kernel image access functions when
the kernel is locked down
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 03:53:00PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> jlee@...e.com wrote:
>
> > hm... patch 4 only prevents write_mem() but not read_mem().
> > Or I missed anything?
>
> Actually, yes, as it happens, patch 11 prevents you from even opening /dev/mem
> and /dev/kmem by locking down open of /dev/port. So I've moved this bit to
> patch 4, simplified and posted a new variant for patch 4.
>
Thank you for pointing out!
Joey Lee
Powered by blists - more mailing lists