[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y3nzzfi7.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 12:30:24 +0200
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>
Cc: "linuxppc-dev\@ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-s390\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bitmap: Fix optimization of bitmap_set/clear for big-endian machines
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 07:39:48AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> Hang on, don't tell me you found this by inspection. Are you not
>> running the bitmap testcase, enabled by CONFIG_TEST_BITMAP? Either
>> that should be producing an error, or there's a missing test case, or
>> your inspection is wrong ...
Oops.
[ 1.907533] test_bitmap: test 13: input is '0-2047:128/256' OK, Time: 1359
[ 1.907596] set not equal 0 8
[ 1.907640] set not __equal 0 8
[ 1.907684] clear not equal 0 8
[ 1.907728] clear not __equal 0 8
[ 1.907772] set not equal 0 16
[ 1.907816] set not __equal 0 16
[ 1.907861] clear not equal 0 16
[ 1.907905] clear not __equal 0 16
[ 1.907949] set not equal 0 24
[ 1.907993] set not __equal 0 24
[ 1.908038] clear not equal 0 24
[ 1.908082] clear not __equal 0 24
...
[ snip ~30,000 lines ]
...
[ 3.345729] set not equal 1008 8
[ 3.345773] set not __equal 1008 8
[ 3.345818] clear not equal 1008 8
[ 3.345863] clear not __equal 1008 8
[ 3.345909] test_bitmap: all 460506 tests passed
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
O_o
With the patch:
[ 1.904393] test_bitmap: test 13: input is '0-2047:128/256' OK, Time: 1359
[ 1.916270] test_bitmap: all 460506 tests passed
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists