[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOssrKd9hN+uezOrFZzchYKkW22ThZ+dA5dbG5_=_K=tH2LqQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 16:15:21 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Xiong Zhou <xzhou@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] fsnotify: clean up fsnotify_prepare/finish_user_wait()
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com> wrote:
>>> -bool fsnotify_prepare_user_wait(struct fsnotify_iter_info *iter_info)
>>> +/*
>>> + * Get mark reference when we found the mark via lockless traversal of object
>>> + * list. Mark can be already removed from the list by now and on its way to be
>>> + * destroyed once SRCU period ends.
>>> + */
>>> +static bool fsnotify_get_mark_safe(struct fsnotify_mark *mark)
>
> Sorry, hit send too soon...
> This helper is now more than "get mark safe"
> how about fsnotify_get_mark_wait() to pair with fsnotify_put_mark_wait()?
It's get mark and pin mark->group. I think "safe" describes that
adequately. Added comments to reflect that.
Also renamed fsnotify_put_mark_wait() to fsnotify_put_mark_wake(),
because that's what it does.
Thanks,
Miklos
Powered by blists - more mailing lists